Christianity is rooted in history. The
New Testament begins with a genealogical table that most modern
readers find almost incomprehensible [Matthew 1:1-17]. The purpose of
this genealogy is to locate the birth of Jesus in space and time according
to the standards of Jewish history. The appeal to "the first eye-witnesses,"
in the prologue to the Gospel of Luke, is also clearly intended to engage
the skepticism of Greco-Roman readers by providing specific historical
data against which ancient readers could weigh the writer’s claims [Luke
3:1-2]. Throughout the gospels, as Sir William Ramsey pointed out, are
many references to historical data and specific geographic locations
[Gasque]. So important is historical truth that its denial becomes a
mark of heresy for New Testament authors [1 Corinthians 15:1-8;
1 John 4:1-3].
Clearly, the Bible is steeped in history
and the remembrance of history. Both the Old and New Testaments constantly
reminded their readers about particular historical events [cf. Deuteronomy
4:9-14; Acts 7]. Thus parents are commanded to teach their children
the significance of history [Deuteronomy 6:4-25] both by retelling the
story and through commemorations which enact the central acts of salvation
[Exodus 13:3-16; 1 Corinthians 11:23-26]. Further, an appeal is frequently
made to visible memorials that remind people of God’s wonderful deeds
[Acts 2:29-36]. We also find both Jews and early Christians visiting
historic sites as acts of devotion [Luke 2:21-41; Acts 21:17-27].
The importance of history, and the way in which we remember
past events, is recognized by many influential opponents of Christianity.
Karl Marx, for example, argued that the ability to control history,
or rather the interpretation of history, was an essential step in the
abolition of religion [Marx and Engels 1955:42-58]. Almost a century
later, Adolf Hitler made a similar appeal to history and historical
necessity [Hitler 1941:675-676; Bormann 1988:83-87]. Both Marx and Hitler,
following in the footsteps of enlightenment skeptics like Tom Pain [Paine
1974:49-51] sought to establish the truth of their revolutions by denying
the validity of Christian history.
Our web sites are, we hope, a small contribution to
the reestablishment of a sense of history and cultural pride among Christians.
Following the Biblical model we believe that visiting places and seeing
where great events took place helps people remember and understand the
present as well as the past [Joshua 4:1-7; cf. Schaeffer 1987:214-225].
Anyone involved in education knows that people remember
things by association. The act of visiting a historic site creates associations
that simply reading about something does not. Through the engagement
of all our senses we are able to make associations which enable us to
remember the importance of events and ideas that would otherwise seem
dead and dreary facts with little connection to our present life.
For example a visit to Wittenberg has an immediacy which
makes the work of Martin Luther live in ways that no book can fully
convey to the reader. Walking around Luther’s home, seeing the chairs
he sat in, visiting his wife’s garden, observing where he debated with
his students, recognizing the hardships he endured, makes the Reformation
real to the visitor. This is because many things are only fully realized
when all of our senses are engaged by the specifics of a particular
place.
It is our hope that these web siteswill bring history
alive and with a sense of history a growing awareness of the realities
of faith in our world. As Francis Schaeffer repeatedly loved to point
out there is a flow to history because Christian faith is rooted in
space and time [Schaeffer 1968:92-104]. To forget our history is the
first step to the abandonment of our faith, the triumph of secularism,
New Age spirituality, and the rebirth of paganism.